From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 16 12:21:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4861065670 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:21:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192A98FC08 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:21:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhq12 with SMTP id hq12so973481wib.13 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 04:21:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MsJ0MTYnAsnaS6NSms84y0/TcDNQOvZampJ6aa/UPm8=; b=xYLNlfWoO0bM5z2KSpcQcZS8YkgiYsGo1i33UvdO7fsXcVZN2pyQrRYm6YyoR2Vueh 1/yHkeQLBGLERTqyVFq1iZ2a0n1ZrRs3X6F8MWFJIubO5Z43iW9FTbEETXuTrXBv3K35 zpMOE3U3ovzBSrs+suipP8irvpUPycIfzIDOM= Received: by 10.180.95.199 with SMTP id dm7mr19458116wib.9.1326716490932; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 04:21:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gf8sm22055969wbb.11.2012.01.16.04.21.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 04:21:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:21:27 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120116122127.7ee58697@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20120116125959.9ac522cc.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <4F1363E4.2090104@paz.bz> <20120116064639.ef2dba63.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120116055451.GG51930@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <201201160532.12066.lumiwa@gmail.com> <20120116125959.9ac522cc.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: dot snap folder X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:21:32 -0000 On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:59:59 +0100 Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 05:32:11 -0600, ajtiM wrote: > > On Sunday 15 January 2012 23:54:52 Chip Camden wrote: > > > Quoth Polytropon on Monday, 16 January 2012: > > > > On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:40:20 -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote: > > > > > Is it permissible to delete the dot snap folder which is > > > > > created in a filesystem? > > > > > > > > First of all, it's called a directory, not a "folder". :-) > > > > > > After all, it doesn't fold (for that you need a little Haskell or > > > OCaml). > > > > ...and the answer if is it permissible to delete .snap directory > > is?? Thank you. > > The answer has been provided two times, none of them is > quoted above or below. :-) > > I may repeat: It is permissible _unless_ you are running > the dump program on a live partition using the -L option. > > As the question has been answered, I'm not sure it has. AFAIK it's also used by background fsck.