From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 31 03:24:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63EF1632; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 03:24:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x234.google.com (mail-we0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBAE31515; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 03:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id w62so1850747wes.11; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:24:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kEa9XWue/2Qbee5NpqdxPvwdB3InGDmcn65KMZoNTUY=; b=u4uPmwjcNBHcPycAJYaRJ+J3rH24BOnH0w4kkrauif1ocqIDW5mdK0JL7DAS5VQyIj tttvKyraOqcFAKirZ3fy1d3CfovPfVzbZCLt/vozQDBtj5/r4flYr/tGpxAhLa2CF/eY J51PEwLEwUCGElBrjrgx6YTT2LFmoTBQatTVSJiRZASXfQIY+eJrF2lvfXS898hoASy3 Ss/UhfKq3K+sGLEkbQVYjkU6km7VT7e+LFgmPRluZaS6WVMcI2ieiRwiTpD7wM3/leqJ ic6DDkFjuXJqtcUvuRkqK6Cnxc78iwk7youK8iA54RPKwr/R/w2D7I9g5qT1h837fbPf Ve2w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.72.177 with SMTP id e17mr109655812wiv.42.1419996292964; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:24:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.106.136 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:24:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <57150.1419930741@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <54a1ec2a.853c460a.1d8a.2b34SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <57150.1419930741@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 22:24:52 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD BSD License 3 -> 2 Clause History From: grarpamp To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , imp@freebsd.org, Theo de Raadt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 03:24:55 -0000 On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > I think you are reading more into that commit than it contains: > It merely asserted "Copyright of Compilation" over FreeBSD. Likely. My original post wasn't worded well. I was mostly interested in the rationale of removing the endorsement clause (from a license writers perspective of new work, not any particular application of same), which though 'simpler and more free', would seem a tricky thing to give up, or to model new work on after having seen 3-clause texts. Though, to be sure, the rest of this thread is good to recount as well. For new, unfunded, work by individual committers, where is the link to FreeBSD equivalent of this OpenBSD template? It seems attractive. http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/share/misc/license.template?rev=HEAD > as response to the trademark finally getting back to the project > after the WC/IX/WR saga. Thinking that's Walnut Creek, and maybe Wind River, but I forget IX, unless it's IX Systems.