From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec  5 12:03:07 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 284D16D5;
 Thu,  5 Dec 2013 12:03:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 926831683;
 Thu,  5 Dec 2013 12:03:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hq4so9692693wib.14
 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 04:03:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=OjKsZ1WkIYxQTEjuxKWkq4fNbLoUFWBJSUaZdOkm58s=;
 b=RXYQkLMRXDctdTM/rCYF5SXVL7PLAhpvVEjg3c7+eThzy6mzyjGuNPX8wnXgqAXbmN
 Gl8kAhggSQhYCnx1BgmFUt+C3Y1vC+RchJA5zWJJA2AvVp3BT75xgQJRg2CjJk6YyUne
 5hsGrMa/rBn90Hyn6wKnJkeIKOPRY086IbD9PF4h+JFADvkiiJFFN3LJb5TchSH/BLtw
 Ff3ZqXJpCQHxvyrAajStChESvyZGOYve8TI7KvyQ3EO72ZKfm67mEtxS6C85adGeGym9
 0YMq0sJs689L64aup6/QeNQV51wpMhjNZ843GIWpspE7rYWj9aMXb2FgbiSRWyyLIHFe
 +LUA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.89.68 with SMTP id bm4mr11960836wib.0.1386244985049;
 Thu, 05 Dec 2013 04:03:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.71.9 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 04:03:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20131205114534.GG76976@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
References: <CA+nPUkw3zqCDRiKf1LbZsV6g4oxdNGWoe79CBKXqAgVn16QB_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20131205114534.GG76976@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 18:03:05 +0600
Message-ID: <CA+nPUkw7KOp+brtXf8gc-MAq+3WOm3jk8HttLg39AQizVNkD8g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Force Dependent ports OPTIONS
From: Muhammad Moinur Rahman <5u623l20@gmail.com>
To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 12:03:07 -0000

Hi Bapte,

RFC3779.

BR,
Muhammad


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 05:42:15PM +0600, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Let us suppose I am porting an application which depends on Openssl. But
> > not only OpenSSL, OpenSSL has to have some options enabled which are not
> > enabled by default. How can I force changing the knob?
> >
> > Slave port is an option I have thought. But anything else? Thanks in
> > advance.
> >
>
> Creating a slave port will be a nightmare for openssl, what option are you
> depending on? is it intrusive, does it make sense to have it by default?
>
> Those are the questions, depending on answers the good way could be to
> remove
> the option from the openssl port and activate by default the feature.
>
> regards,
> Bapt
>