From owner-freebsd-hardware Mon Jun 5 01:31:17 1995 Return-Path: hardware-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id BAA09668 for hardware-outgoing; Mon, 5 Jun 1995 01:31:17 -0700 Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA09659 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 1995 01:31:15 -0700 Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with ESMTP id BAA14128 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 1995 01:16:32 +0200 Received: from (roberto@localhost) by blaise.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) id BAA12263 ; Mon, 5 Jun 1995 01:15:01 +0200 From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) Message-Id: <199506042315.BAA12263@blaise.ibp.fr> Subject: Re: VLB Supported? To: apollo@io.org (Andrew Herdman) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 1995 01:15:01 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: hardware@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from "Andrew Herdman" at Jun 4, 95 01:33:35 pm X-Operating-System: FreeBSD BUILT-19950501 ctm#617 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 433 Sender: hardware-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > is it supported? I have re-built the kernel, pulled out all the PCI > defines, but there don't seem to be any VLB defines. Is VLB > automatically supported? Yes, you're not supposed and I don't think the system does, to make any difference between std iso periph and VLB ones. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD keltia 2.0-BUILT-19950503 #3: Wed May 3 19:53:04 MET DST 1995