From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun May 5 17:52:13 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3621590B45 for ; Sun, 5 May 2019 17:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26D786B6F8 for ; Sun, 5 May 2019 17:52:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([92.193.173.201]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue012 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1MYLqs-1hIRU13TL0-00VN0z; Sun, 05 May 2019 19:52:03 +0200 Date: Sun, 5 May 2019 19:52:03 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Erwan David Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: firefox 66.0.3 disables noscript Message-Id: <20190505195203.d86ab99b.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <9ec48bde-8880-555a-58bb-a4bb74793c96@dreamchaser.org> <201905050718.39277.dr.klepp@gmx.at> <20190505083949.3d14b628.freebsd@edvax.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:i0AlHmSeRD+whvG4J2lbKajrzb/zKBqbgylrKeFG9g+dvvTPIIM NvRXcTwEJin0cS7ekUL3XWiv5m4/3Heu8FTsPqZGbBIEeqGIzP/9HK346s6eyf2/RTgXbMz LOyNlE0obYmPOMzJPmm9ssKQwdFWBcunGBBnklFsXi+LsvWbWLGKiv3H28LjUhr4fies5K3 at/BXSQwfrAP94ZDhuKRw== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:1WB8rEOkGec=:Bu1Dxe+/SmIs2vWUzAj5I4 iZWBcmSMWhBg9R4wXG5JAp84OXJPACTayC0ZFGPCMp92GnlyFAFBqVRQ9uI9NPxVXFt1uhU0c xO7Y8wlhAt1oHv3hjgWkd7j7VPjDv9qsS+rrRQzN/OdEcgZoCRbEYh8bxvGgtojPtxh9bTHk7 LH5O5pwcVoZ+q6zFY0fvsNzNGUy9UoWaxAI5nOBd8hqkXf35Uo7J9LgSS3ZWHrS8dhau/JG1O VubHDh1NGqcOo6w6kzWdtdFhq5RzGB+nflTM0FrUl/4eA6yfhwy26Bq+XUIRgPnUO640FFEmb aXg2GIQ3cDINvkoBMxRfS0Kgv8fFv2rUJPvOwhtzrTMDWaAJHpWInXAl2ug8vp8AZ5DfdMGV6 TMVYdDE8bA3x7mjAhsfzrVBY126XQfBV5G3SBl57Lu4q22uVwCMhvrimOIaPL7IqC/ti4Pl36 us196DuTMXrxEPPcZI8rkkY7YAaD5tH8ZwcIEYvpTEOJPQqchbAye2ri9yhl4gALzelEyBSTZ 3qJCi8sAbbgPOzPk1MFVBmEfnt6pDKTddvxHnEwJJe+1sWqu31xAXYHi63nnfU5gWzQpgiP/C tBJTAPLpnR02sDc6CGHNzEV8EIP47NsTWCF5vwJ+Rf7zwZX4F0bf7v/Zv+HgPrnwZm8QOFmoq kqpx/LetD12Z5QvO9GXrBBLBWWuRucCNa0yJZQ2rCjSQonMIwfamj9h03t8/72tb4lXp3MDRO HUXqoKqSlya+aHZK4hYSK0GozP1awwscO1oVBErfq+14ooHCmTm35kPp2NI= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 26D786B6F8 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.98 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.981,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 May 2019 17:52:14 -0000 On Sun, 5 May 2019 11:11:36 +0200, Erwan David wrote: >=20 > Le 05/05/2019 =E0 08:39, Polytropon a =E9crit=A0: > > On Sun, 5 May 2019 07:18:39 +0200, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote: > >> Not only noscript, but all extensions. > > Correct! > > > > > > > >> But you can get them working again: > >> > >> about:config, then set: > >> xpinstall.signatures.required=3Dfalse > > Similar problem here, noticed selected language was no longer > > working. There is an additional setting that might help with > > the language packs: > > > > about:config > > intl.locale.requested =3D de > > extensions.langpacks.signatures.required =3D false > > > > However, this should be just a temporary fix. FF suggests you > > delete and re-install the signed (!) versions of your extensions > > and language packs. > > > > >=20 > https://blog.mozfr.org/post/2019/05/Mise-a-jour-%3A-les-modules-complemen= taires-de-Firefox > (in french) says that it could lead to dataloss It seems to be worse for Tor users, as Roman Mamedov noted: Turns out an unrelated 3rd party can suddenly remotely disable Tor anonymity protections at their whim, and possibly endanger TBB [ - Tor Browser Bundle] users (or deliberately help in deanonymizing them). https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2019-May/045116.html --=20 Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...