Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 18:56:12 +0300 From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net> Cc: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: f6826de8fbdf - main - www/firefox: update to 107.0 (rc2) Message-ID: <Y3JlHIDbvPMpHoSX@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <Y2/8V0jut0Thzck4@elch.exwg.net> References: <202211102100.2AAL0bnl052227@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <Y251VmC5Kh/10eaS@hades.panopticon> <Y26XHTtfjQWQMR8Z@elch.exwg.net> <Y26kQpynZDMblguC@hades.panopticon> <Y2/8V0jut0Thzck4@elch.exwg.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Christoph Moench-Tegeder (cmt@burggraben.net) wrote: > > > And for the minors often there's only one rc, which then becomes GA, > > > and I don't want package churn for no-ops. > > > > Do we really need rc's packaged then? > > The idea is that we get the bugfixes (most often security stuff) > earlier - also to give the package builders a head start (everyone > else gets packages built by upstream before release day, and we > have our own package cluster). > For the majore releases, we could spot and fix FreeBSD-specific > problems before GA - at least in theory, as I do not have that much > time for that, and most problems these days are self-inflicted by > the users, anyways. Okay then, the current way of firefox packaging looks reasonable. Thank you for explanation! -- Dmitry Marakasov . amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: https://github.com/AMDmi3 https://amdmi3.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Y3JlHIDbvPMpHoSX>