From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 30 18:13:51 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F18016A4BF
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 30 Sep 2003 18:13:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BAA943FBF
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 30 Sep 2003 18:13:51 -0700 (PDT)	(envelope-from ps@mu.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 22FB22ED4BC; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 18:13:51 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 18:13:51 -0700
From: Paul Saab <ps@mu.org>
To: Damon Permezel <zeph@damon.com>
Message-ID: <20031001011351.GA14166@elvis.mu.org>
References: <200309300903.LAA02656@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com>
	<A02B447E-F33F-11D7-A85B-000A957C9058@damon.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A02B447E-F33F-11D7-A85B-000A957C9058@damon.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 4.9-RC and bge
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 01:13:51 -0000

Damon Permezel (zeph@damon.com) wrote:
> The CVS log indicates that there have been 2 recent changes based on 
> BCM5701 errata.
> I suspect that this is hosing the 5700.

Without knowing what version you were running previously, it is hard to
say what broke you, but I dont think the No_CRC bit is the cause.