From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 13 11:41:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE1116A400 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:41:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@areilly.bpa.nu) Received: from omta05sl.mx.bigpond.com (omta05sl.mx.bigpond.com [144.140.93.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D51613C46A for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:41:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@areilly.bpa.nu) Received: from oaamta07sl.mx.bigpond.com ([144.132.228.157]) by omta05sl.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20070313114148.WNDT25724.omta05sl.mx.bigpond.com@oaamta07sl.mx.bigpond.com> for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:41:48 +0000 Received: from areilly.bpa.nu ([144.132.228.157]) by oaamta07sl.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20070313114144.QMI21236.oaamta07sl.mx.bigpond.com@areilly.bpa.nu> for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:41:44 +0000 Received: (qmail 32906 invoked by uid 501); 13 Mar 2007 11:31:53 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:31:53 +1100 From: Andrew Reilly To: Jens Fallesen Message-ID: <20070313113153.GB32408@duncan.reilly.home> References: <0F5570EA-7E34-4971-961F-32DD121F4DF2@khera.org> <45F083EB.1090308@fallesen.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45F083EB.1090308@fallesen.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Vivek Khera , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: any success with new sun "M2" product variant for X4100 and X2100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:41:50 -0000 On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 10:45:15PM +0100, Jens Fallesen wrote: > The primary NICs are Broadcom, the secondary ones are Nvidia as part of > the chipset (FreeBSD does not recognise those). I've been running the "nfe" driver with the "ciphy" patch for probably greater than six months on my NVidia nForce4-based Athlon X2 system. I don't understand why it hasn't been rolled into -stable yet. Admittedly I haven't tested nve for a while, but the comment above doesn't instill confidence. Without the ciphy patch none of the drivers even detect carrier, which means that the base system still doesn't include those bits... Cheers, -- Andrew