From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 11 09:25:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D53916A4CE; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:25:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from orion.frasa.net (orion.frasa.net [195.241.98.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC77943D41; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:25:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markfra@ws01.frasa.net) Received: from localhost (orion [127.0.0.1]) by orion.frasa.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C793C53F; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:25:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orion.frasa.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (orion.frasa.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55020-07; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:25:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ws01.frasa.net (ws01.frasa.net [192.168.0.2]) by orion.frasa.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107C73C9; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:25:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ws01.frasa.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F14EC85188; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:26:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:26:13 +0200 From: Mark Frasa To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey Message-ID: <20041011092613.GA22464@ws01.frasa.net> References: <1097429004.20378.12.camel@ws01.frasa.net> <20041011011302.GE1140@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041011011302.GE1140@wantadilla.lemis.com> X-GPG-Key: "CDFB B007 5DD1 8382 2755 1EE5 F5FD 519B E33F 430C" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd at frasa.net cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vinum swap no longer working. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mark Frasa List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:25:15 -0000 --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2004.10.11 10:43:02 +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] >=20 > Overlong lines. >=20 > On Sunday, 10 October 2004 at 19:23:24 +0200, Mark Frasa wrote: > > Hello, > > > > After installing FreeBSD 5.2.1, because 4.10 and even 5.1 did not > > reconized mij SATA controller, i CVS-upped and upgraded to 5.2.1-p11 > > RELEASE > > > > After that I configured Vinum to mirror (RAID 1) 2 80G Maxtor SATA > > disks. > > > > The error i am getting is: > > > > swapon /dev/vinum/swap > swapon: /dev/vinum/swap: Operation not > > supported by device > > > > I have taken notice of this message: > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [missing attribution to Greg Lehey] > >> On Sunday, 28 December 2003 at 20:00:04 -0800, Micheas Herman wrote: > >>> This may belong on current,> I upgraded to 5.2 from 5.1 and my > >>> kernel (GENERIC) now refuses to use /dev/vinum/swap as my swap > >>> device.>> # swapon /dev/vinum/swap> swapon: /dev/vinum/swap: > >>> Operation not supported by device> # Is this a 5.2 bug or do I have > >>> vinum incorrectly configured? > >> > >> This is a 5.2 bug. It was last mentioned here a day or two ago, and > >> I'm currently chasing it. > > > > Since this is a message from the 28th of December 2003 , can anyone > > tell me when this issue will be solved? Otherwise i have to > > consider buying PATA disks which allows me to run 4.10 again. >=20 > Vinum is being rewritten; the new one is called gvinum or geom_vinum. > It handles swap, and it should be in 5.3. >=20 > Greg > -- > When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. > If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. > For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html > See complete headers for address and phone numbers. Does the vinum in FreeBSD 4.10 has the same problem?=20 If not i might consider to buy PATA disks and run software raid because=20 i rather use 4.10 then 5.3. Mark. --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBalG19f1Rm+M/QwwRAjBOAJ9z07E1dzriwbsxtSmuzm8g94FzmQCfd4cY EAPhQ1oIhGz/HMNDZNQw4Gw= =ekY3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+--