From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Oct 4 2:39: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from pasha.anand.org (pasha.anand.org [199.103.176.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D829E150A1 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 1999 02:38:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from arb@anand.org) Received: (qmail 12165 invoked by uid 1001); 4 Oct 1999 09:38:51 -0000 Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 12:38:51 +0300 From: Anand Buddhdev To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: upgrade clobbering my "sendmail" Message-ID: <19991004123851.O11327@africaonline.co.ke> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i Organisation: Africa Online Ltd, P O Box 63017, Nairobi, Kenya X-Phone: +254-2-243775 X-WWW-Homepage: http://www.anand.org X-Duties: SysAdmin, Hostmaster, Postmaster, Programmer, Support Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've done binary upgrades from 3.0 to 3.1, and from 3.1 to 3.2. Both times, the upgrade clobbered my sendmail->qmail link, and overwrote it with the real sendmail. I had to fix it manually both times. Is FreeBSD going to stick to sendmail always, or do they plan on making sendmail an option, so that an upgrade doesn't clobber our qmail/exim/postfix installations? -- See complete headers for more info To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message