From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 18 21:06:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2ABCA84 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ignoranthack.me (ujvl.x.rootbsd.net [199.102.79.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCD261FF5 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.73.160.242] (nat-dip7.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.116]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sbruno@ignoranthack.me) by mail.ignoranthack.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00E9B1928E0; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: What happened with the GlusterFS port? From: Sean Bruno To: Outback Dingo In-Reply-To: References: <28234312-7982-49F5-83FD-865649AA9CCB@ultra-secure.de> <1397850220.58880.16.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+fUqUxaEtY5kqHVLWm8k" Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:06:28 -0700 Message-ID: <1397855188.58880.26.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: FreeBSD FS X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: sbruno@freebsd.org List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:06:29 -0000 --=-+fUqUxaEtY5kqHVLWm8k Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 15:51 -0400, Outback Dingo wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Sean Bruno > wrote: > On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 21:30 +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote: > > Hi, > > > > does anybody know where the effort to port GluserFS to > FreeBSD went? > > > > There=E2=80=99s this (very) outdated wiki-page: > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/GlusterFS > > > > and there=E2=80=99s the SoC project: > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/SummerOfCode2013/GlusterFSport > > > > But nothing seems to have happened after it was finished. > =20 > =20 > =20 > The port made decent progress over the GSOC period, but no, it > never > gained any traction to end up in the ports collection. > =20 >=20 >=20 > not to hijack the thread but, glusters ancient, use riak-cs, or swift, > or port leofs >=20 > =20 > sean > =20 > =20 > =20 >=20 >=20 I think swift and then ceph to be honest. At least that's what my universe looks like. sean --=-+fUqUxaEtY5kqHVLWm8k Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAABAgAGBQJTUZPUAAoJEBkJRdwI6BaHJ2EIAIO/Z7FVd5sOq68y9l94s3j5 6uH2Nfj8erM4zpH9L3CjuXc9JAtb+ivZTB/Y2vkmIFuUQwRP9jZ8y/YeDHwiubI0 fh0aLo4zfB9RRWj9dHKXkUVBp5FLQx44mYHVCcKckG/G2J3q3OLSq1u6vjyll+4Q pavislC540jNq80Mzu0XMMCJto3IH/+XT0slYP0Rl+4XKVCg0TytAU9MPyd01PDM V0VnZmTIWE+10PY9+xe+xkPTTV2TGiwPxml2so7uZm2/NdN5Uu6TA627uJCqS/XZ ou+F/HgQpHQN1yH0qPPCAbPwpdzgsVP4NNfbcsYFeVNhXqTtzlH53g92/JKARHg= =byT4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-+fUqUxaEtY5kqHVLWm8k--