Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:17:00 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Cc: freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com> Subject: Re: Eliminating IPv6 (?) Message-ID: <94c95322-700e-422f-1358-19d577a8b15c@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <201906192332.x5JNWQxB020511@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> References: <201906192332.x5JNWQxB020511@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
20.06.2019 6:32, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >>> I've not run a userland without V6 in a long time once I started to have >>> issues with some things. >> >> Can you give an example of such script in base system, please? >> >> If you have such script or binary not in our base, it's not our fault :-) > > That is an extremly aragant position to take. Your basically saying that > only the base system scripts have to function correctly and that any > script not part of the base system has no need to be supported. > > Go tell this to the ports people... *sigh* I'm saying that areas of responsibility should be denoted. If there is some script in the world written with bad assumptions, its author/maintainer is responsible in fixing it. FreeBSD already provides sysctls kern.features.inet and kern.features.inet6 to make it easier for scripts.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?94c95322-700e-422f-1358-19d577a8b15c>