From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Wed Nov 18 19:24:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39670A32ADC for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:24:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CD2B1A05 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:24:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tAIJOU6Z064798 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:24:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 204661] Either zdb doesn't correctly report block size of zfs root files, or ZFS isn't applying recordsize to files in the zfs root Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:24:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: misc X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: chris@acsi.ca X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:24:31 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204661 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Forgeron --- Ah yes, I tried 'zdb -d $pool/ $N' when my first attempt didn't work, so it does seem a natural way to find the info. I would suggest the most error-free way would be to follow Solaris' lead on this, as my command syntax shouldn't be different when I'm in the root dataset or not. Of course this is probably a non-trivial update. Any recommendations for an alternate way to watch IO size for a file? a dtrace script that targets an inode perhaps? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.