From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 4 11:58:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3276F37B718 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 11:58:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f24JwCi27817; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 11:58:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 11:58:11 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Farooq Mela Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pthread_exit proto Message-ID: <20010304115811.Q8663@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <3AA29546.7D709D6@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AA29546.7D709D6@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us>; from fmela0@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us on Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 11:19:34AM -0800 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Farooq Mela [010304 11:18] wrote: > > Hi, > > Could someone with CVS write access make the following change in > pthread.h > > void pthread_exit __P((void *)); > > to > > void pthread_exit __P((void *)) __dead2; > > as this function doesnt return and gcc is giving me some annoying > warnings ;-) > > BTW, what is the standard mechanism for submitting a patch such as > this. I know this probably isn't the really correct place to post > this... using send-pr: http://www.freebsd.org/support.html#gnats Is '__dead2' a GNU C thing? or is in any sort of standard? Generally there's some resistance to putting GNU C specific code into the base system, is there a portable way to do this? -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message