From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org  Fri Jul 24 00:42:46 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E7E9A997E
 for <freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:42:46 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from allbery.b@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C73251C53;
 Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:42:45 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from allbery.b@gmail.com)
Received: by wicmv11 with SMTP id mv11so44931967wic.0;
 Thu, 23 Jul 2015 17:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=UC8jE9cPR9UbRpxENE2rN6aukdDntV3Dc94MO+GH/dQ=;
 b=YL8cidzSuYEfk+fbp2xzQFJBnmZNUgUfzxLwQ6/45y7uwjbdL/gKNjHwkYPE5Jumw9
 2SbMCESQmTPhqHP/1AcBxPLyTrAgXMYOw+DwJvHoo2D3jXBhpk5ER7Wa6a0RR8X3rixm
 JY/+ImYwltiIYIQW/jcCcM0d5DqhhBuO4PI1X9iPGvzvDg+YsTMIikEqyvwkkfp7H6Az
 ZSrFf/cr40LYfbaK8DAw29AGzsp5FP0+0XWq4g7uA14MVMti9+0SpjPzeJuefmf72K8o
 v3flewmsTCWKs/lBmdrC3wYk1So6CcE3jvMueF03qv60AjtIerzlR9fJX7gtIp2sTR9L
 EcMw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.121.100 with SMTP id lj4mr20978945wjb.104.1437698564397; 
 Thu, 23 Jul 2015 17:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.27.133.84 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 17:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150724004026.GA1370@lonesome.com>
References: <55B17B7A.4080402@gmail.com> <20150723234805.GK84931@FreeBSD.org>
 <55B18488.9060602@sorbs.net> <20150724004026.GA1370@lonesome.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:42:44 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKFCL4VVtLspj+RQxSHjyQxAhixPuMiQoehoA2MYWeSgqTTwAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..?
From: Brandon Allbery <allbery.b@gmail.com>
To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Cc: Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net>, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org>, 
 freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>,
 Jason Unovitch <jason.unovitch@gmail.com>, herbert@oslo.ath.cx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:42:46 -0000

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote:

> zfs is a resource hog.  i386 is not able to handle the demand as well
> as amd64.
>

Even amd64 is no guarantee. I installed one of the Illumos spinoffs on a
2GB amd64 netbook (they mostly force zfs). I think it lasted 2 days before
the kernel panics started.

-- 
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allbery.b@gmail.com                                  ballbery@sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net