From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 29 09:39:19 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E09816A41F;
	Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:39:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241E443D45;
	Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:39:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5802096;
	Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:39:14 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO
X-Spam-Learn: ham
X-Spam-Score: -2.4/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on tim.des.no
Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D061D2081;
	Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:39:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id A873C33C8D; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:39:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0603282330150.21936-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
	<442A49FC.9050307@samsco.org> <86wtedd32u.fsf@xps.des.no>
	<442A510D.9060403@samsco.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:39:13 +0200
In-Reply-To: <442A510D.9060403@samsco.org> (Scott Long's message of "Wed, 29
	Mar 2006 02:19:09 -0700")
Message-ID: <86odzpd1z2.fsf@xps.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, Ganbold <ganbold@micom.mng.net>,
	freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: libpthread compile failure
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:39:19 -0000

Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> writes:
> Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
> > Don't blame deischen, it was my mistake.
> Sorry, I wasn't blaming Dan.  I am a bit frustrated, though.  At the
> very least, when doing changes like you are doing, please send an
> email to the lists telling people that the tree might be unstable for
> a bit of time.

The problem was that I made this change in the context of a larger
patch, and didn't realize that committing it without also committing
other parts of that larger patch would break the tree.  I should have,
though, and I should have tested it in a clean tree before committing.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no