From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Nov 17 12:16:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3303C37B401 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 12:16:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E475143E88 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 12:16:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83EB78A19FA; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 16:16:17 -0400 (AST) Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 16:16:17 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Eric Anderson Cc: Mattias Pantzare , Anthony Atkielski , FreeBSD Chat Subject: Re: FreeBSD: Server or Desktop OS? In-Reply-To: <3DD7F107.DCE620A6@centtech.com> Message-ID: <20021117161015.L23359-100000@hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Eric Anderson wrote: > Anyway, I still say everyone should realize that in order to make > -STABLE as reliable as it sounds, and -RELEASE more rock solid than it > has ever been, we need to have a group of people running their standard > tests on it before releases go out. I think you have the right idea, yet backwards ... we need a group of developers who are focused on fixing the bugs reported ... I'd go back to -STABLE in a minute if I knew someone was available to focus on getting the bugs reported fixed ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message