From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 20 15:22:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597D216A4CE for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:22:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA93243D62 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:22:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so704787rng for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:22:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=cY2LZl9JQFOocF9bl2qiz8eAKubB0JzZQzzD4X9mpMCIDDAJ6UL2n98l0txZOSWEYai7t6qUdyX9N0ociQd4a9JLMHcY2W8IJoLUKX2LdkRTiIGawJGl54r4WIdVloHNzbC0daL+LdjxoMw9QlWX4oHTvWvlvVjGcwaUb0Qxoao= Received: by 10.38.152.6 with SMTP id z6mr3909376rnd; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:22:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:22:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 16:22:24 +0100 From: Gert Cuykens To: Abu Khaled In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what is the difference between WCPU and CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:22:25 -0000 On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 16:09:18 +0200, Abu Khaled wrote: > On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:10:57 +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 01:57:32 +0200, Abu Khaled wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 22:04:10 +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > > > I was looking at top and wondering the difference between WCPU and CPU > > > > > > Have you tried "man top" > > > > > > "WCPU, when displayed, is the weighted cpu percentage (this is the > > > same value that ps(1) displays as CPU), CPU is the raw percentage and > > > is the field that is sorted to determine the order of the processes." > > > > I read the top man but it does not explain what weighted cpu is and raw cpu is. > > > http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=57634 > i like the last sentence, nice and simpel. why couldnt they call it ECPU estimated cpu time?