From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 14 16:22:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084FBA82668 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 16:22:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E3441BCF for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 16:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id f206so440195258wmf.0 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 08:22:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=BG1/XRyDQ5qIIi39El4ktIyWkvuXq3s3GaLs2puiQxU=; b=ptYXGNptn9kK605GuFW8U3DyUMeSfWvlMO8putczw144540lJZAqh3fvw8TBPzbJxJ PzPCRbC+UvepC0zfDJB6YtlVJ6iiq+5fb4w6FMdBKogvjCOWTotrlrPsOmOVRmXM/8H4 0hCM6n7UzNQ/eeGKCmBMZewrLImrwO5qE69uPmwK+XC4G5OpInPpPkZ5nuzG3YQOo0IO JhRSYKQ+fJf3HR+lOnxJ2odJ40fYhsnq2m8umZGPx+vL/V1WPWUHHUaWWoK8rkEOccu4 nuY7NDvVK+jSrAfbuS9/Cqe4BaYYnXqeXZMEj1iSOfypHAXm9Dd9N7W9IXQc6ZDu30me +gFQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=BG1/XRyDQ5qIIi39El4ktIyWkvuXq3s3GaLs2puiQxU=; b=Ks2mz2o+wPxnIPWdcYm8Iun+AlsQld6P7yuOjH1HYWCFUIuGjU0gCdH7wPM0aJpoSW 1ijjnlbBFrnu1QUuj5wLAXt+974ytRG7hrEDj9AFRPx9Ey9Px5wlxrB0uueSDTimraxW jiWZdIA8rMPPBX1Am6Qi56GufL7RdwtnSi89vG/HzH4gcHcszt4iaRse7nDerHPfsEAV XOOGlSP2iYlEBGucTuacjfO4R02t+2aDrclJzciAojZBYfT33EJdLkmq30ZjT9Uew7aJ yCuO81iqL2JkuJAmgWOMu/NkUy3nGEcYY78s7oFQA2+2F9N+iQ+JZX0vEupY3AXTJLBZ KZuw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkylmWQSBqWT5rshH3nQj95oJIKzoWxWWalZ+Vp8j4JXaylZJR7PCzfuqJ4sKl2SfTwuDxngM9gvEFc6sfslmkG0CH3lg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.240.67 with SMTP id vy3mr5066184wjc.168.1452788521876; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 08:22:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.192.33 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 08:22:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201601141500.u0EF0OSl028841@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <201601141500.u0EF0OSl028841@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:22:01 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: tcsh fg bug? From: Adam Vande More To: mexas@bris.ac.uk Cc: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 16:22:05 -0000 On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I'm using tcsh. > > > jobs > [2] + Running xpdf pap.pdf > [3] - Running xautolock -time 1 -locker slock > > fg 3 > xpdf pap.pdf (wd: ~/nobkp/out/2016/autotune) > > > which is wrong, right? > No, unless you consider ignoring the 3 'wrong'. > > Can anybody reproduce this behaviour? > Since fg wasn't invoked with a proper job name, the current job is resumed. -- Adam