From owner-freebsd-security Tue Oct 1 12:56:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C040237B401 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 12:56:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cithaeron.argolis.org (pool-151-200-243-89.res.east.verizon.net [151.200.243.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18E643E6A for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 12:56:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from piechota@argolis.org) Received: from cithaeron.argolis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cithaeron.argolis.org (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g91JhOEl017667; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 15:43:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from piechota@argolis.org) Received: from localhost (piechota@localhost) by cithaeron.argolis.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) with ESMTP id g91JhNJn017664; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 15:43:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: cithaeron.argolis.org: piechota owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 15:43:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Piechota To: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group Cc: Brett Glass , Aaron Namba , Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD's tar susceptible to this? In-Reply-To: <200210011803.g91I3glk004506@cwsys.cwsent.com> Message-ID: <20021001154227.E15368-100000@cithaeron.argolis.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group wrote: > > Why the GPL? It would have been just as likely to happen in BSD tar, > > except you'd have lots of people with their own patches that no one else > > could see. While the GPL isn't > > People, please take this GPL discussion to -chat. Thanks. Sorry, I actaully started to write, thought, "Why the hell would I sent this to -security?" and hit C-x instead of C-c by accident. Oops. -- Matt Piechota To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message