From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 26 20:32:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6BA16A77A for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:32:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C753C444A5 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:09:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DE0290C2C; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 17:08:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44073-10; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 17:09:00 -0300 (ADT) Received: by hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1046) id 88DA5290C46; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 17:08:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8393C290C2C; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 17:08:57 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 17:08:57 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: freebsd@hub.org To: Max Laier In-Reply-To: <200608261848.16513.max@love2party.net> Message-ID: <20060826165209.V82634@hub.org> References: <20060825233420.V82634@hub.org> <20060826112115.GG16768@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20060826132138.H82634@hub.org> <200608261848.16513.max@love2party.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSDStats - What is involved ... ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:32:26 -0000 On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Max Laier wrote: > fetch(3) makes use of a couple of environment vars to set proxy and > authentification - this should be reuseable. I haven't looked at > BSDStats yet, but if you use fetch - just make sure you have the ENV and > things work. Anyone with an Authenticated Proxy able to code up a patch for this? > I guess the easiest way, would be an email to root@ which can be > forwarded to you. This way you can enable it by default and the > operator can still decide if they want to take part in the process. Actually, email would provide no ability to do the 'request-challenge' that we have currently implemented in an effort to *reduce* (although I know it won't eliminate) ppl "spamming" the system ... the authenticated proxy issue, IMHO, doesn't negate the r-c system, since we aren't basing anything, *except* country, on the IP itself ... So, although using http won't allow *all* hosts to participate, our hope is that it will provide enough numbers with suitable checks-n-balances as to make the #s viable, and realistic ...