From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 18 21:16:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90F2CD53; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:16:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x22c.google.com (mail-ob0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BFB810E5; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:16:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id wo20so2253502obc.31 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:16:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=T7fWUS74LULsw+DEX7leSbZMeLENpHlooerOPCYQzuY=; b=CW4PtWLy3w1Q6YbSI51GadnthudDzEAmcdYoZF3haYOkcxXQEMDQy+NmirhPmr+2H6 JzcYaiD63pf+kCPA5RzIu7CQ/C5SVnwGhFYoNoHsBHjsGChoKJQFkAZXds732tf5X+f4 zGrLu9hAp19qHfZ7pdFT7k8TG+stCALA8fHDCwdR0X7dhFbYZK2urPXxRkeGH/cB7Upu XJfLWX6QUSa9RyK6+1sOnukz8ymR2Xt7hbA+BJtUI3LLb9oG6mZPCeAp82ykapa77lou KRQvac3lMzBQD4q/C06zTew0cpp7cjcumy/2e+YHvlXRJYH+/qJPbqs8sfKVyj70ReJU Ea7A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.161.101 with SMTP id xr5mr28270oeb.71.1397855769540; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:16:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.170.4 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:16:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1397855188.58880.26.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> References: <28234312-7982-49F5-83FD-865649AA9CCB@ultra-secure.de> <1397850220.58880.16.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> <1397855188.58880.26.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 17:16:09 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What happened with the GlusterFS port? From: Outback Dingo To: sbruno@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: FreeBSD FS X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:16:10 -0000 On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: > On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 15:51 -0400, Outback Dingo wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Sean Bruno > > wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 21:30 +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > does anybody know where the effort to port GluserFS to > > FreeBSD went? > > > > > > There=E2=80=99s this (very) outdated wiki-page: > > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/GlusterFS > > > > > > and there=E2=80=99s the SoC project: > > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/SummerOfCode2013/GlusterFSport > > > > > > But nothing seems to have happened after it was finished. > > > > > > > > The port made decent progress over the GSOC period, but no, it > > never > > gained any traction to end up in the ports collection. > > > > > > > > not to hijack the thread but, glusters ancient, use riak-cs, or swift, > > or port leofs > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > > > > > I think swift and then ceph to be honest. At least that's what my > universe looks like. > does ceph run on freebsd yet ??? i knew there was a port in the works but like the glusterfs ports, it seems to have died also > > sean > >