From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 26 09:06:10 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98C6D82C7F for ; Fri, 26 May 2017 09:06:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from v.maffione@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com (mail-oi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 970C814A2 for ; Fri, 26 May 2017 09:06:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from v.maffione@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x233.google.com with SMTP id l18so5614470oig.2 for ; Fri, 26 May 2017 02:06:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eCK2UgVlXDKtc1LLPWdVlCbKEgIoG4dh/uGMh9b+q5s=; b=g5s2Jd6c3lb8brE3kCM5B5bImYiAAe5a+Fr/SP6eD3yxE69CRNmwb62kfPUDieOTTt wWOxDQw28vDvpC8b6E6l2QIlUcWtQ3mY4etl0GQliBmdLOuFx/IKF9vl3YAPJZd8FZVV SniCRh9BePFatZudeoG+L9ctTyiuir85kX547m72A7LuEOv8gpYA7fN/TjZ98EK5BPbE K/tkWqlTVNkF3wP10TfUULJjefXc3EHYLM66W46d8Hf/zur2gcDxgidPidF31mdKntgx FURBHssFjmsQn32vgNAGvWdTGD2uIkNKez7UPA8fx4m22qEGi/3gAFjwI7ZKQSkt0xYS wzug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eCK2UgVlXDKtc1LLPWdVlCbKEgIoG4dh/uGMh9b+q5s=; b=Dn2sP1iLlYegy1aJ8krUiYncr2wdL1AfpgkkeGNbEeqOL0WSSkHEjNJ9/wxQq+0m+k 7GHWieJizFv5t+7fg2CrSOvED18TKpAwNh8JraUckDsVBIytUSZZlU2sPntInB7D8VBE 5tsIBg5IdU4MNuKoqG6yi0ADDeO069ewHbwUmkE32bmFhWqGLGfT2R6ldWSwIFh4F0VU H4LkrMLdTNzSEzpc9Qz63IqvLZz+jHAbcZh0IIvrbno/MnZTJR08Fl9A/QGGWlczNPZn KP6aSoK12f4R07D1yOj2ar1o5+OjbPOTY4CXTla9TrwVUPqq+szCQ+S33S44jcJ/3y1g 9neQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCBeaBYvmvXQlX+4Gf0dcqfehEe+K+abtPr054fSVYjcVaC70wM XNP+n7DzP4xuGO8nQnbMA9h47nBUXw== X-Received: by 10.202.205.196 with SMTP id d187mr422723oig.6.1495789570012; Fri, 26 May 2017 02:06:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.17.59 with HTTP; Fri, 26 May 2017 02:06:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5927EF05.9040208@omnilan.de> References: <58CBCD7A.8060301@omnilan.de> <58CC23F5.7060507@omnilan.de> <58CFA394.8070901@omnilan.de> <5926EE96.1010000@omnilan.de> <5926F9F9.4040706@omnilan.de> <592701D6.7030301@omnilan.de> <592742A8.4010207@omnilan.de> <5927D560.10003@omnilan.de> <5927D77A.60502@omnilan.de> <5927E974.6060706@omnilan.de> <5927EF05.9040208@omnilan.de> From: Vincenzo Maffione Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 11:06:09 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [panic] netmap(4) and if_lagg(4) To: Harry Schmalzbauer Cc: FreeBSD Net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 09:06:10 -0000 Yes, it should integrate and compile out of the box, I've done that several times with FreeBSD-11.0 and 10.3. And yes, HEAD contains recent code, you can also use that. Cheers, Vincenzo 2017-05-26 11:01 GMT+02:00 Harry Schmalzbauer : > Bez=C3=BCglich Vincenzo Maffione's Nachricht vom 26.05.2017 10:41 (localt= ime): > > Ok, so you should try to completely replace the code in your > > /usr/src/sys with the code in the upstream netmap > > repository https://github.com/luigirizzo/netmap (sys directory). > > Sorry beeing so complicated; But is there a real chance this integrates > and compiles well out of the box? > My build machine (which is not the test machine) doesn't have internet > access and additionally I'm not faimilar with git, so I'd have to find a > solution getting the source first. And if I need to adapt/port anything > to match stable/11, I won't be abel to do so (much too less knwoledge > about all that code). > > I guess HEAD has already updated codebase. > Maybe it's better to start with HEAD? > But on the other hand, my test equipment is semi-productive with a quiet > special setup (memory-rootfs with additional ZFS boot and sys-pool)... > Very complicated I am... > > worth the stable/11 attempt? > > thanks, > > -harry > > > --=20 Vincenzo Maffione