From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 18 08:18:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95DE0E85 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:18:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rpaulo@FreeBSD.org) Received: from felyko.com (felyko.com [IPv6:2607:f2f8:a528::3:1337:ca7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C1F8FC08 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:9:4d00:85:29ff:bbc4:fa98:46d2] (unknown [IPv6:2601:9:4d00:85:29ff:bbc4:fa98:46d2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by felyko.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3CD33981E; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 00:18:24 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: FreeBSD needs Git to ensure repo integrity [was: 2012 incident] From: Rui Paulo In-Reply-To: <50a8eb34.5pMwq6kSsi47QgKI%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 00:18:23 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <163A6B50-3214-4711-BDF2-3882D15B99AF@FreeBSD.org> References: <20121117221143.41c29ba2@nonamehost> <50a8eb34.5pMwq6kSsi47QgKI%perryh@pluto.rain.com> To: Perry Hutchison X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Cc: fidaj@ukr.net, gmx@ross.cx, grarpamp@gmail.com, utisoft@gmail.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:18:25 -0000 On 17 Nov 2012, at 23:05, Perry Hutchison wrote: > [trimmed some of the lists] > > Chris Rees wrote: >> ... git doesn't work with our workflow. > > I'm sure the workflow itself is documented somewhere, but is > there a good writeup of _how_ git doesn't work with it, e.g. what > capabilit{y,ies} is/are missing? Seems this might be of interest > to the git developers, not because they necessarily want to support > FreeBSD as such, but as an example of a real-world workflow that git > currently does not handle well. Peter had something to say about it: http://wiki.freebsd.org/GitDrawbacks Regards, -- Rui Paulo