From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 20:34:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BACA106566B for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 20:34:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deeptech71@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 141408FC0A for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 20:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eekd17 with SMTP id d17so2153566eek.13 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:34:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of deeptech71@gmail.com designates 10.14.28.137 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.14.28.137; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of deeptech71@gmail.com designates 10.14.28.137 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=deeptech71@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=deeptech71@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.14.28.137]) by 10.14.28.137 with SMTP id g9mr14036662eea.94.1331066062099 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:34:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=o5ZMQS5ZPtqH3peYkwQWSvdZGveK+RFND28AvHkFIhw=; b=zCAkD33isgZQ3gAbZg7TrR++6dyuspDL6uEQPQcAeAufzcnaAsxjAek02YEtTRSR88 d891E3MSlfGQeeHQXVLYzBx8gDf2kQYPVd8SvxO5ZpHZdYwFI2owIRKQdm/GHwhh6wAS U1lq5ce/ZRzYAgZa0B0avgjpH5dGxJA7J4ttIsSc/AYmpgnfV4nRkWKQC7gBMdxkEsNK AM/s4SlyvqSNUt35+beI4bk5idzDhMdk8B9GgzPZfO30+dvLvR4rDUiJXEIedNhQDCOb R7pI9KbQ3ttbxyq3v8P2tFL1xk+UZZVBphDZy7TS0KFn3jTFWece3Vz7q9XDkxa+878H ZayQ== Received: by 10.14.28.137 with SMTP id g9mr10671039eea.94.1331066062012; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:34:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.80] (dsl4E5C3DF1.pool.t-online.hu. [78.92.61.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y11sm17253950eem.3.2012.03.06.12.34.20 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:34:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F5675D9.5050509@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:38:49 +0100 From: deeptech71@gmail.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120229 Firefox/10.0.2 SeaMonkey/2.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: "rm -rf /" fanclub X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:34:23 -0000 Peter Maloney wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:41 PM, deeptech71 at gmail.com > wrote: > > X11R6 should be a symlink to local or ./local. > > Did you test this, by removing the link and creating it > relative to see if there are any stupid side effects? No apparent side effects. And I can't even see why there would be any. In both cases (X11R6 points to "/usr/local" vs X11R6 points to "local") - "/usr/X11R6" resolves to the symlink, although different symlink texts can be extracted; - "/usr/X11R6/" resolves to the "local" directory in "/usr"; - "/usr/X11R6/file123" resolves to "/usr/local/file123". TODO: Test whether purely removing X11R6 has any side effects.