Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 09:46:53 -0500 From: Paul Mather <paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> To: "Mark E. Mallett" <mem@schmem.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-23:16.openzfs Message-ID: <72154019-C07D-4E34-8100-923DE013797D@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <ZWvHxOiy5VYRY63w@schorl.qozzy.net> References: <20231201031737.DF0231B942@freefall.freebsd.org> <ZWsI4SbNU2xPjaPF@marvin.hueftgold.tld> <ZWvHxOiy5VYRY63w@schorl.qozzy.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2 Dec 2023, at 7:11=E2=80=AFpm, Mark E. Mallett <mem@schmem.com> = wrote: > Might I also ask (or say): >=20 [[...]] > Third, it says the binary upgrade will result in 12.4-RELEASE-p8. = When > I do the freebsd-update, the result according to uname is > 12.4-RELEASE-p6. Thinking that perhaps I have to do it again, I am = told > No updates needed to update system to 12.4-RELEASE-p8 > and yet uname -a still says 12.4-RELEASE-p6. Somebody might ask if > I did a reboot, and yes. Sometimes a security advisory or errata notice affects only the userland = and doesn't cause the kernel version to be bumped. The "uname" output = you're seeing is only the kernel version. If you want to see both = kernel and userland versions you should use "freebsd-version". The "-k" = flag will show userland and "-u" the userland. I would imagine in your = case "freebsd-version -u" is 12.4-RELEASE-p8. Cheers, Paul.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?72154019-C07D-4E34-8100-923DE013797D>