From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Apr 21 22:21:09 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA14887 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 22:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from panda.hilink.com.au (panda.hilink.com.au [203.2.144.5]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA14878 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 22:21:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from danny@localhost) by panda.hilink.com.au (8.8.5/8.7.3) id PAA09178; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 15:20:54 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 15:20:53 +1000 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" To: Michael Smith cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64 bit number definitions? In-Reply-To: <199704220506.OAA13118@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 22 Apr 1997, Michael Smith wrote: > Daniel O'Callaghan stands accused of saying: > > > > File offsets are described as off_t which is a quad_t, which is a 'long > > long'. > > > > I don't know why off_t is not u_quad_t (unsigned long long). > > So you can seek backwards. Of course. Now, can you help me find my brain? Must be in my coat pocket. Danny