Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 24 Apr 2001 01:31:52 -0500
From:      "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
To:        "Peter Pentchev" <roam@orbitel.bg>
Cc:        <ports@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Reminder samba-devel -> samba22
Message-ID:  <085e01c0cc88$4048b820$931576d8@inethouston.net>
References:  <080e01c0cc84$0e693860$931576d8@inethouston.net> <20010424090458.A22159@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <083601c0cc86$07e1dae0$931576d8@inethouston.net> <20010424091843.B22159@ringworld.oblivion.bg>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At a first glance it might seem too many, but I'd like to atleast keep the
2.0 branch in the tree for a while incase 2.2 has some bugs that 2.0 does
not.  I found one of them that existed in 2.2 and not 2.0, but luckily they
were able to fix it before it was time to release 2.2
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Pentchev" <roam@orbitel.bg>
To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
Cc: <ports@FreeBSD.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 1:18 AM
Subject: Re: Reminder samba-devel -> samba22


> I think Maxim Sobolev's suggestion about samba20 and samba was most
> to the point, although, with the need for a samba-devel port, there get
> to be three Samba ports..  I don't necessarily think that's a bad thing.
>
> G'luck,
> Peter
>
> --
> This sentence every third, but it still comprehensible.
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 01:15:57AM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> > That's true, but some people expressed concern for those who wanted to
stick
> > with 2.0.8 and just have samba20 and samba22 in the ports.  Either way
is
> > fine for me just as long as samba-devel doesn't stay that way forever.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Peter Pentchev" <roam@orbitel.bg>
> > To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
> > Cc: <ports@FreeBSD.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 1:04 AM
> > Subject: Re: Reminder samba-devel -> samba22
> >
> >
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 01:01:51AM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> > > > Just a reminder to whomever takes care of this to rename samba-devel
to
> > > > samba22 since it isn't alpha anymore.
> > >
> > > I don't really know if samba22 is a good name..  Isn't it supposed to
> > > be just 'samba' now that it is the 'official' branch?
>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?085e01c0cc88$4048b820$931576d8>