Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 09:17:40 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf-mardorf@riseup.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (very OT) Ideal partition schemes (history of partitioning) Message-ID: <20200830091740.7cfd94cf@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <20200830085848.68ab4832@archlinux> References: <CAGBxaXkf53K4EHtq9cDaRm3MOZZixyBq-aQfZ7upHo-wUwrmCg@mail.gmail.com> <20200829154417.8dd5f83d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20200830085848.68ab4832@archlinux>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:58:48 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>I guess not many people really need a multi-boot with more than 3 or 4
>operating systems, that require a primary partition and not many
>private persons really need to store more than 2 TB/disk.
^^
This should read "2 TB
of data/disk"
2 TB are a lot and we could use 2 or more drives.
I can't comment on server farms, but we probably waste a lot of
resources to store selfie videos, showing people taking selfie photos.
Maybe all the useful data stored by one or the other server farm could
be stored even on a 1 TB drive. I suspect that most stored digital data
nowadays is nothing but digital waste.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200830091740.7cfd94cf>