From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 7 17:55:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BDD16A401; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 17:55:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-12.arcor-online.net (mail-in-12.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6FF413C455; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 17:55:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.16]) by mail-in-12.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC034C4B7; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 19:55:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-in-03.arcor-online.net (mail-in-03.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.43]) by mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD82ABF61; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 19:55:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (dslb-084-061-130-219.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.61.130.219]) by mail-in-03.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4E92765AE; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 19:55:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (www@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.13.8/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l37Htfqk026660 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 7 Apr 2007 19:55:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.13.8/8.13.3/Submit) id l37HtfFS026659; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 19:55:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: lofi.dyndns.org: www set sender to lofi@freebsd.org using -f Received: from 213.196.231.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user lofi) by lofi.dyndns.org with HTTP; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 19:55:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1348.213.196.231.115.1175968541.squirrel@lofi.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <200704071151.50787.andy@athame.co.uk> References: <003901c778d8$e53b8260$0100a8c0@team1> <1175928275.59311.40.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <200704071151.50787.andy@athame.co.uk> Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 19:55:41 +0200 (CEST) From: "Michael Nottebrock" To: "Andy Fawcett" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: kde@freebsd.org, Vijay Patel , ports@freebsd.org, gnome@freebsd.org, Ade Lovett Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] gettext error X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: michaelnottebrock@gmx.net List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 17:55:55 -0000 Andy Fawcett wrote: > On Saturday 07 April 2007 11:32:19 Ade Lovett wrote: >> On Apr 06, 2007, at 23:44 , Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >> > Well, I've already expressed my opinion that threading be disabled. >> > Since FreeBSD doesn't allow mixing threaded libraries with non- >> > threaded >> > executables (without linking the executable with PTHREAD_LIBS) :-(, >> > threading is just dangerous. I don't think we want to force all ports >> > that link to libintl to become thread-aware. >> >> Yup. I think this is the way to go myself. I'd just like consensus >> from the KDE folks before I simply bump PORTREVISION and add -- >> disable-threads to CONFIGURE_ARGS. > > Sounds fine to me too. We've not had it threaded before, so not missed it > either. > > Unless lofi has some strong objection to this, consider this an ok from > kde@ Ok from me as well. FWIW, we'd probably be fine either way, since everything that links to qt already needs to link to a threads library. -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org