From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 27 17:03:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77EC41065670 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 17:03:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-fs@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339908FC16 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 17:03:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QxMHj-0002X6-44 for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 19:03:07 +0200 Received: from cpe-188-129-77-230.dynamic.amis.hr ([188.129.77.230]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 19:03:07 +0200 Received: from ivoras by cpe-188-129-77-230.dynamic.amis.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 19:03:07 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 19:02:44 +0200 Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <1963980291.20110826232758@serebryakov.spb.ru> <201108262052.p7QKqpen039191@chez.mckusick.com> <758608837.20110827112116@serebryakov.spb.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpe-188-129-77-230.dynamic.amis.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 In-Reply-To: <758608837.20110827112116@serebryakov.spb.ru> Subject: Re: Strange behaviour of UFS2+SU FS on FreeBSD 8-Stable: dreadful perofrmance for old data, excellent for new. X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 17:03:11 -0000 On 27.8.2011. 9:21, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > I'm going to investigate alter, why it is ony ~180MiB/s, when > theoretically it should be about (90*4) 360MiB/s linear read, and whom > to blame: UFS or geom_raid5 or both :) Try this: http://ivoras.net/blog/tree/2010-11-19.ufs-read-ahead.html (or it could be a hardware issue - controller bottleneck or something like that).