Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 15:07:50 +0200 From: Marcus von Appen <mva@freebsd.org> To: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r366360 - head/japanese/xyaku Message-ID: <20140828150750.Horde.eDEICDG2bDf3pW_wCjH6fg8@webmail.df.eu> In-Reply-To: <20140828065840.GB29054@FreeBSD.org> References: <201408272118.s7RLINi5090741@svn.freebsd.org> <20140828063758.GA21706@FreeBSD.org> <53FED035.1020404@marino.st> <53FED248.5030503@marino.st> <20140828065840.GB29054@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 08:55:04AM +0200, John Marino wrote: >> Actually, thinking about this, what I said isn't really true. I don't >> always use "@" for known freebsd users. However, the PR number is >> provided and people can look it all the information there. The >> "submitted by" is courtesy information. Frankly I can omit the line >> completely. Only the PR is actually required. > > It's funny that I tend to do the same. ;-) If I can find a clear and nice > way to give credit (e.g. PR came from a committer or I know the full name) > I will likely do it; if it came from anonymous (sole email counts as such > as well) leaving PR number alone is preferred. I vote for that - I'd even say that, if a PR number is known, it's sufficient to use only that as reference. If the change came by e.g. mail, or s.th. similar Submitted by: should be used. It'd be nice, if we could handle it like that. Cheers Marcus
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140828150750.Horde.eDEICDG2bDf3pW_wCjH6fg8>