From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Aug 31 11: 1:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13061159E8 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 1999 11:01:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA08511; Tue, 31 Aug 1999 12:00:28 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id MAA12397; Tue, 31 Aug 1999 12:00:01 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199908311800.MAA12397@harmony.village.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Subject: Re: KAME IPv6 and freebsd Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , itojun@iijlab.net, Mark Murray , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 31 Aug 1999 12:01:45 +0200." <28661.936093705@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <28661.936093705@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 12:00:01 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <28661.936093705@critter.freebsd.dk> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: : >Hmph. I guess common sense wins over ITAR in this case. :) : : That's certainly an improvement in that particular battle :-) Speaking of ITAR, has anybody actually every approached FreeBSD to say what we're doing is in violation of ITAR? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message