From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 25 15:38:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E4F16A421; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:38:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl) Received: from palm.hoeg.nl (mx0.hoeg.nl [83.98.131.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFF813C484; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:38:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl) Received: by palm.hoeg.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3ECF81CC5A; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:38:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:38:40 +0200 From: Ed Schouten To: Andrey Chernov , Alexander Kabaev , current@freebsd.org, kan@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070625153840.GP27942@hoeg.nl> References: <20070625130913.GA50273@nagual.pp.ru> <20070625133951.GA51324@nagual.pp.ru> <8e5ef5f70706250659v48f64410wb5399985a571087e@mail.gmail.com> <20070625145627.GA53685@nagual.pp.ru> <20070625151508.GO27942@hoeg.nl> <20070625152559.GA54055@nagual.pp.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Ws+C+3cFyVqcopd2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070625152559.GA54055@nagual.pp.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Cc: Subject: Re: Silent gcc 4.2.0 loop optimization bug with -O2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:38:41 -0000 --Ws+C+3cFyVqcopd2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Andrey Chernov wrote: > I am not familiar with gcc bugs reporting system at all. Could somebody= =20 > running 4.2.1 snapshot tells, is it already fixed, by chance? If no, coul= d=20 > sumebody fill bug report to them or provide detailed instructions how to= =20 > do that, please? I couldn't find a similar bug in Bugzilla (though my knowledge of GCC internals is quite poor), so I opened a new bug: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D32500 Yours, --=20 Ed Schouten WWW: http://g-rave.nl/ --Ws+C+3cFyVqcopd2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGf+GA52SDGA2eCwURAoixAJ93aq4UKaKeKlO4oSLoYO9VMelTEgCeNZz1 3IeJfSvKjjk1ybySjNJkgjA= =aG0u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Ws+C+3cFyVqcopd2--