From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 7 23:58:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F679D3A6A for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 23:58:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ike@michaeleichorn.com) Received: from mx1.eichornenterprises.com (mx1.eichornenterprises.com [104.236.13.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.eichornenterprises.com", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B3901F97 for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 23:58:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ike@michaeleichorn.com) Received: from mail.eichornenterprises.com (cpe-184-59-147-149.neo.res.rr.com [184.59.147.149]) by mx1.eichornenterprises.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 5345481e; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 18:58:27 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail.eichornenterprises.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 2c2727c2 TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 18:58:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1449532706.6801.2.camel@michaeleichorn.com> Subject: Re: Synchronizing directory hierarchies via SFTP From: "Michael B. Eichorn" To: Patrick Hess , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 18:58:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <3931169.O6iNsM7Ae5@desk8.phess.net> References: <13761006.QDN0LtKzYl@desk8.phess.net> <3931169.O6iNsM7Ae5@desk8.phess.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 23:58:33 -0000 On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 00:08 +0100, Patrick Hess wrote: > Terje Elde wrote: > > You could mount the sftp locally (sshfs, fuse?), and then use rsync > > as if with two local dirs? > > Thanks, that's definitely an interesting option that didn't come > to my mind. > > > (If that will be efficient depends a lot on your workload) > > Based on my previous experience with FUSE a couple of years ago, > I'm actually more concerned about the reliability of this solution. > In my case I'm looking at some 1800 files, for a total of 3.4 GB, > of which about 300 MB will change weekly. Is this a workload FUSE > could be trusted with nowadays or am I likely to run into issues > in the long term? I havn't used it on a FreeBSD rig, but I use sshfs regularly on my Linux rigs and it has been reliable and surprisingly performant. I don't know how similar/different the Linux and FreeBSD fuse implementations are so, YMMV.