From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Aug 2 19:52:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2BA37B400 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 19:52:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stono.cs.cofc.edu (stono.cs.cofc.edu [153.9.17.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3674F43E70 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 19:52:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jimmy@cs.cofc.edu) Received: from [153.9.17.27] (burton.cs.cofc.edu [153.9.17.27]) by stono.cs.cofc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g732iQV32365 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 22:44:27 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: jimmy@stono.cs.cofc.edu Message-Id: Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 22:56:01 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "James B. Wilkinson" Subject: NO vs NONE in rc scripts Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I found out this evening that you have to say sendmail_enable="NONE" rather than sendmail_enable="NO" in order to shut it off. A cursory search didn't locate any other cases where NO won't do it. I hate to be a complainer, but I wonder if there is a good reason for this. I'm not on this list, so if you want to beat me up for asking this, you'll have to send it directly to me. I subscribed for a while, but the volume got to me. Thanks -- ------------------------------------------------------------- Jimmy Wilkinson | Perfesser of Computer Science jimmy@cs.CofC.edu | The College of Charleston (843) 953-8160 | Charleston SC 29424 If there is one word to describe me, that word would have to be "profectionist". Any form of incompitence is an athema to me. Metathesis??? Don't ax me. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message