Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 23:43:08 +0300 From: Alexander V. Chernikov <melifaro@freebsd.org> To: Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com>, Hooman Fazaeli <hoomanfazaeli@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: projects/routing announcement/status Message-ID: <80401472330588@web2g.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <FEAD2713-15E7-4CDD-8216-1AFF37F2475A@netgate.com> References: <6151261453419663@web14j.yandex.ru> <57C1C4D3.8060604@gmail.com> <FEAD2713-15E7-4CDD-8216-1AFF37F2475A@netgate.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
27.08.2016, 20:58, "Jim Thompson" <jim@netgate.com>: >> On Aug 27, 2016, at 11:50 AM, Hooman Fazaeli <hoomanfazaeli@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Second have you considered replacing the existing radix tree with a faster data structure, specially the Luigi DXR >> tables? (Sorry for re-posting #2, I incidentally sent an html-only reply). One of the goals was to be able to ease switching between different structures for different purposes on-fly. I did consider using DXR and there was even some glue code to make it modular lookup algo in ipfw tables: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=271932 DXR is very fast when handling full-view, but, as Jim already mentioned it is ipv4-specific. Also, it might be overkill when having small number of routes (e.g. typical non-routing host). > > DXR only supports IPv4. FYI. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?80401472330588>