From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 15 20:41:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E1E16A41F for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 20:41:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5BD43D46 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 20:41:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8FKfi0Z089452; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:41:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Kiffin Gish In-Reply-To: <007801c5ba2f$4dbe8d10$2201a8c0@ZGISH> References: <007801c5ba2f$4dbe8d10$2201a8c0@ZGISH> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-KRD55c3kvC4+EPC9mKTE" Organization: FreeBSD, Inc. Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:41:05 -0400 Message-Id: <1126816865.53593.4.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: Is Gnome 2.12 worth the hassle? X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 20:41:12 -0000 --=-KRD55c3kvC4+EPC9mKTE Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 21:54 +0200, Kiffin Gish wrote: > Sorry for bombarding you with so many questions, but I am new to this gam= e. >=20 > By 'Devel FAQ URL' I assume you mean > http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/develfaq.html, right? Yes. >=20 > and then I should follow the instructions at > http://www.marcuscom.com:8080/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/, right? Those as well as read everything in my announcement email as well as in the Devel FAQ _very carefully_. >=20 > But I see everywhere that this is the so-called development version, wher= eas > I am only interested in the one-shot 2.12 version -- which I assume is > ready, will not change, and thus does not require resyncing to the tinder= box > with cvs. If you re-read my announcement email, you will see where I address the issue of "development." GNOME 2.12 work is being done in the MC repo, ports module until it is merged into the FreeBSD ports tree. At that time, the ports module will resume its "development" status, and people not wishing to track development code should stop merging the MC repo. Joe --=20 Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome --=-KRD55c3kvC4+EPC9mKTE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDKdxhb2iPiv4Uz4cRAumBAJ4gK3y9uf61JKFpWUYbidixdSvHtgCfbu9e OYT5d/pYAQX0u78ogEzA3HY= =ye+9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KRD55c3kvC4+EPC9mKTE--