From owner-freebsd-net Mon Oct 14 3:25:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB0137B401 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 03:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from office.LF.net (office.LF.net [212.9.190.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F1943E8A for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 03:25:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from voodoo.oberon.net ([212.118.165.100]) by office.LF.net with esmtp (Exim 4.04) id 1812PY-0006Xd-00 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 12:25:20 +0200 Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.10) id 1812Oy-000Dfq-00 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; пн, 14 окт 2002 12:24:44 +0200 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 12:24:44 +0200 From: Kirill Ponomarew To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: delayed ACK Message-ID: <20021014102444.GA52491@krion> Mail-Followup-To: Kirill Ponomarew , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, is it recommended to use net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0 on the machines with heavy network traffic ? -- MfG Kirill Nothing is ever so bad it can't be made worse by firing the coach. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message