From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 11 09:00:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9093D1065696 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:00:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: from smtp.mel.people.net.au (smtp.mel.people.net.au [218.214.17.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB6D18FC08 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:00:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: (qmail 22320 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2008 08:33:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blizzard.dnsalias.org) (218.215.138.143) by smtp.mel.people.net.au with SMTP; 11 Oct 2008 08:33:58 -0000 Received: by blizzard.dnsalias.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 358F317046; Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:33:56 +1100 (EST) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:33:56 +1100 From: andrew clarke To: Sokolov Alexey Message-ID: <20081011083356.GA29557@ozzmosis.com> References: <200810111035.44555.nullbsd@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200810111035.44555.nullbsd@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: It is illogical layout of ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:00:41 -0000 On Sat 2008-10-11 10:35:44 UTC+0300, Sokolov Alexey (nullbsd@gmail.com) wrote: > The location of some ports contradictory. They need all rank in the > categories you want. For me in most cases the category is superfluous. I will usually just use: cd /usr/ports/*/portname > www/firefox-i18n > mail/thunderbird-i18n Are these in the wrong category? > net-im/echat (irc/echat?) net-im seems correct. I don't think eChat is an IRC client.