From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Wed Nov 7 09:22:13 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084FC1121591; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 09:22:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A1A889777; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 09:22:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (etoilebsd.net [178.32.217.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 288C69A4E; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 09:22:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4AFAE98E51; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 10:22:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 10:22:11 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Niclas Zeising Cc: Koichiro Iwao , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r484357 - head/mail/spamassassin Message-ID: <20181107092211.dgcvichyunbss35x@ivaldir.net> References: <201811062146.wA6LknN3005274@repo.freebsd.org> <20181107083105.55o52urafcgdthec@ivaldir.net> <20181107091004.xbvzfyviyrkcbi2m@icepick.vmeta.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="efxgitdyvqu5bc4d" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5A1A889777 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-108.59 / 200.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ALLOW_DOMAIN_WHITELIST(-100.00)[FreeBSD.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx1.FreeBSD.org]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:96.47.64.0/20, country:US]; IP_SCORE(-3.38)[ip: (-8.41), ipnet: 96.47.64.0/20(-4.67), asn: 11403(-3.74), country: US(-0.09)] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 09:22:13 -0000 --efxgitdyvqu5bc4d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 11/7/18 10:10 AM, Koichiro Iwao wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 09:31:05AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > Is there still a need for the japanese spamassassin? if yes, can't th= e specific > > > patch be incorporated in the regular one? > > >=20 > > > That would simplify the life of many people to have only one spamassa= ssin > > >=20 > > > Bapt > >=20 > > AFAIK yes. Additional patch improves spam detection accuracy on emails = written > > in Japanese but using mail/spamassassin's accuracy is not too bad. > >=20 > > Regarding the current japanese/spamassassin port, I think it is depreca= ted. It > > is created for the old version of spamassassin and not updated for year= s. > >=20 > > I can found another Japanese tokenizer patch for the latest > > spamassassin. The port should be renewed based on this: > >=20 > > https://github.com/heartbeatsjp/spamassassin_ja > >=20 >=20 > Hi! > japanese/spamassassin is up for grabs. If you are interested in maintain= ing > it and in updating it with that patch, I can help a little. I don't have > time to maintain it myself. > Regards Can't those patches be available in the files directory on the mail/spamassassins so we have one single port to maintain? Best regards, Bapt --efxgitdyvqu5bc4d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEgOTj3suS2urGXVU3Y4mL3PG3PloFAlvirsAACgkQY4mL3PG3 Plo/PBAAxuKmvAENJZ7mXXVbp66PHDUMMVwYXc3MXS2k7TuKiEhVLz1f4kfbsaBB Egq3SNjetMsUDkDHaeaa82Kg/4dlfPFCABC84CNLFIOZ3jVZ9Hc6XJbN/D0NuOjN n0bjUOfsXrvCnfwSsDjG8G+DJ36EV+mDBgrRLVbN4rWPYPnegW/CnT5hQUaJzxko lGESI52SknV7ZOO/H4JLj3C1IWtAIrqxil4/DI25WPY5m7epsnxULvRTCNJm0AK/ ns5bjI2OsGExenYj0ibZR+CIEvc/0j4VA+pRXRKo2vKUILjHxGNY868y+FwrPYSO NvrGFF/E+GMZS1rp9MCfod3fISJ+3ykloDc/MLxmm9L9ZQlWy0AbDvzSKogh7vzH 6Xs40LLT/8QeKMO3Dhc0znOlB9aFxTPhUqLLYPwbxw07inj0N0MZ1rcT1x4fUir7 FxNo7M6bPxFSoJ0hUENeWADiZe3k7BlP/YIgt3SFZktBzOVMo3E771LRPSypD7HF iKPasr7CztQJzY9wKRB3O3NBcDOUjcVGSKqypfZ8E6VwABsrGNEDs88Yz3FxgWsu CkbPYX0/N1ZF1yf3nb/0hW/8R9tu8VogwPl7TLXa3EB8zBM1XPvA7ojIBTBAGylb Ob0dYCnO2N30iv1uOpRz1TXaPV7Ey9sJxhEzBK8qAwWQ7mloys8= =Ib/F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --efxgitdyvqu5bc4d--