Date: Tue, 7 Feb 1995 23:10:26 -0600 (CST) From: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com> To: jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com (Joe Greco) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sup: Ok, I'm gonna do it. Message-ID: <199502080510.XAA07021@bonkers.taronga.com> In-Reply-To: <9502080454.AA08579@brasil.moneng.mei.com> from "Joe Greco" at Feb 7, 95 10:54:47 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I've had some bad luck in the past with vt102, particularly with xterms - I > would agree that it works fine in a majority of the cases, but considering > that vt102 includes vt100am to begin with, I don't think it's unreasonable > to include vt100... :-) (xterm on the other hand is a full blown entry > of its own). That makes sense. For install, it should be possible to make an xterms entry that uses vt100 or vt102 as well, maybe. Let me look at termcaps...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199502080510.XAA07021>