Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1998 15:38:18 -0500 (CDT) From: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net> To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.Org> Cc: patl@phoenix.volant.org, lukin@okbmei.msk.su, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: ldap-3.3 Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.02.9809041534590.29292-100000@fly.HiWAAY.net> In-Reply-To: <35EF32E2.48F0313@OpenLDAP.Org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I agree that this should be separate port. Anyone care to work up a port? I'll try to get it in this weekend with some other changes that I'm working on. Steve On Thu, 3 Sep 1998, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: # Pat, # # My choice of words, in particular the word "update", # was probably not appropriate. It stems for the fact # that OpenLDAP is largely an update of Umich 3.3 and # that the construction of an OpenLDAP port would, # I hope, a cut-and-paste effort. # # OpenLDAP should be a new port. # # In terms of naming, I would prefer any OpenLDAP port # actually be named OpenLDAP (or openldap). I feel that # users looking for a specific package should be able to # find it under its known name. If I found BSD-Free # listed somewhere, I don't think I would necessarily # identify it containing being FreeBSD. # # I believe ports/packages should only be renamed if a # conflict arises with other packages OR it does not # fit within existing naming conventions. # # Kurt # # To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org # with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message # To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.4.02.9809041534590.29292-100000>