From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 20 13:23:50 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580101065673
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:23:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from feld@feld.me)
Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171F78FC1F
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:23:50 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me;
	s=blargle; 
	h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type;
	bh=WKpEB12kIpDOyAnA+SbCyseCDwWRevsIg9u3Ajh3uhI=; 
	b=aJ3o9IbUoRQKwqDbTHx3mLMG8QUcfmdULbKEPS0sMNFd6Gm+7YM8SCgEGXW8jhFm5L8wQIdGFoQB3D6ioyTTKKTXzB4dT6teGNPJhvZ/v29emlNl/WXn5mX0OANqLJFx;
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org)
	by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <feld@feld.me>) id 1ShKss-00002Q-AC
	for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:23:49 -0500
Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4)
	with esmtpa id 1340198620-94480-94479/5/14; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:23:40
	+0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
References: <20120615124849.GI96212@ass.kameli.org>
	<CAKYr3zxSOFOUghqao=3U_8sBNHwqce8AGK6mSFd6is11qzjS8w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120618081140.GK96212@ass.kameli.org> <4FDF6177.5050608@unsane.co.uk>
	<4FDF6586.9060501@gentoo.org> <4FDFB166.2040709@FreeBSD.org>
	<20120620085938.GL96212@ass.kameli.org>
	<CAGwOe2YSkXfx7nbNdYefL1Tm0TSoZOr7oB5cGYY_xhH-QSBsyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:23:40 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
Message-Id: <op.wf7d5qry34t2sn@tech304>
In-Reply-To: <CAGwOe2YSkXfx7nbNdYefL1Tm0TSoZOr7oB5cGYY_xhH-QSBsyw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (FreeBSD)
X-SA-Score: -1.5
Subject: Re: Replacing rc(8) (Was: FreeBSD Boot Times)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:23:50 -0000

On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:27:09 -0500, Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa =20
<fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> wrote:

> Also, in embedded systems, boot time is an important factor.

If you're designing a very specific embedded product based on FreeBSD =
why =20
aren't you writing your own startup system? Why would anyone expect a =20
general purpose "out of the box" OS to excel in a highly optimized =20
embedded environment?