From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 8 20:23:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD9F106568C for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 20:23:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92C1A8FC15 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 20:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta18.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.90]) by qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 327e1e0091wpRvQ518PCto; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 20:23:12 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by omta18.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 38Sc1e0051f6R9u3e8ScmM; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 20:26:38 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:23:08 -0700 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:23:08 -0700 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100408202308.GA61756@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20100328163828.1f34e0e7@it.buh.tecnik93.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100328163828.1f34e0e7@it.buh.tecnik93.com> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: VIM 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 20:23:13 -0000 On Sun 28 Mar 2010 at 06:38:28 PDT Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: >Hi, > > >As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports >are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7 >April. > >The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib >version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. > >We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done, >and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / fixing. > >Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and >http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildports&sort=last_built >to find out if the problem hasn't already been reported or even fixed. >We also have two incremental builds on Pointy to catch the problems. > > >Thank you, > >With hat: portmgr@ Sorry if this seems like nagging, but since we're now past the original ETA can we get a current status report? Is the portstree considered stable again, and if not, what's the revised ETA?