From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 30 14:37:16 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2214316A4CF
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:37:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(adsl-63-207-60-234.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.234])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE3D43FCB
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:37:13 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5])
	by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 57A7C66C9E; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:37:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 28B8886B; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:37:09 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:37:08 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: William Palfreman <william@palfreman.com>
Message-ID: <20031030223708.GA31228@rot13.obsecurity.org>
References: <3FA00634.6000002@potentialtech.com>
	<20031030001309.GA19454@rot13.obsecurity.org>
	<20031030220811.V367@aqua.lan.palfreman.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031030220811.V367@aqua.lan.palfreman.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: chat@freebsd.org
cc: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: How much better are 64 but platforms
X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Non technical items related to the community
	<freebsd-chat.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:37:16 -0000


--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:25:29PM +0000, William Palfreman wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>=20
> > I'd recommend amd64 over itanic..the latter is a vastly complicated
> > processor to support, and gcc apparently does not produce very good
> > code for it.
>=20
> I was wondering how advanced the plans are to bring native AMD64 into
> FreeBSD?  Will it get into 5.x, or will be have to wait for 6-CURRENT?
> I was thinking of buying one of these machines in the spring you see :-)

FreeBSD 5.x has supported amd64 for months.

Kris

--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/oZKUWry0BWjoQKURAq9PAJ4vEfI62qz1FPqNTqK2QygMyyirxgCgzybj
LkSQGRTlP+ykMZ7V6BrJuGQ=
=fBiI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--