From owner-freebsd-java Sat Sep 22 18:23:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from gnuppy.monkey.org (cx739861-a.dt1.sdca.home.com [24.5.164.61]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C5337B40E for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 18:23:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from billh by gnuppy.monkey.org with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15kxzQ-0002jX-00; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 18:23:24 -0700 Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 18:23:24 -0700 To: Carlo Dapor Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: JIT and native threads are mutually exclusive ? Message-ID: <20010922182324.A9717@gnuppy> References: <20010922194328.9CD6A275B6@naboo.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010922194328.9CD6A275B6@naboo.ethz.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i From: Bill Huey Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 09:43:28PM +0200, Carlo Dapor wrote: > Dear Java hackers > > I noticed that running java -version -Djava.compiler=OpenJIT (or =shujit) > with jdk1.3.1, it is correctly reported as green threaded and jitted VM. > > When I launch it with -native, either JITs are not found. > > Is this intentional for the time being ? > > Ciao, derweil, > -- > Carlo Uh, it's probably just flat out broken. I wouldn't worry about it just yet until a more clearly define native threading effort hits alpha/beta testing, Fringe logic like that should then be dealt with more sensibly. ;-) bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message