From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Feb 17 7:41:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from stennis.ca.sandia.gov (stennis.ca.sandia.gov [146.246.243.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C4D1107C for ; Wed, 17 Feb 1999 07:41:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@stennis.ca.sandia.gov) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by stennis.ca.sandia.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) id HAA17089; Wed, 17 Feb 1999 07:41:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199902171541.HAA17089@stennis.ca.sandia.gov> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Randy Bush Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vnc in 4.0-current In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 15 Feb 1999 13:33:02 PST." From: bmah@CA.Sandia.GOV (Bruce A. Mah) Reply-To: bmah@CA.Sandia.GOV X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Url: http://www.ca.sandia.gov/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1250498795P"; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 07:41:01 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --==_Exmh_1250498795P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Randy Bush wrote: > /usr/ports/net/vnc# make > >> vnc-3.3.2r3_unixsrc.tgz doesn't seem to exist on this system. > >> Attempting to fetch from http://www.orl.co.uk/vnc/dist/. > fetch: vnc-3.3.2r3_unixsrc.tgz: resource has moved temporarily to `http://www > .uk.research.att.com/cgi-bin/redirect/vnc/dist/vnc-3.3.2r3_unixsrc.tgz' > Receiving vnc-3.3.2r3_unixsrc.tgz: 0 Kbytes > 894 bytes transfered in 0.0 seconds (135.55 Kbytes/s) > ===> Extracting for vnc-3.3.2r3 > ===> vnc-3.3.2r3 depends on shared library: X11.6 - found > /usr/bin/tar: archive - EOF not on block boundary > *** Error code 1 Oops. As near as I can tell, this problem is caused because the VNC distsite moved. PR ports/9971, which I filed about a week earlier, fixes this problem, although there was confusion on several people's part (including my own) as to whether this patch was necessary and to whether or not the Web server holding the distfile was actually up. Ergo, this patch hasn't been committed yet. (As far as I can tell, it should be OK to commit now, and, it appears, necessary.) Sorry for any inconvenience this has caused... Bruce. --==_Exmh_1250498795P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNsrjDKjOOi0j7CY9AQEjjgP+N0yN+FEOgwRBT795a3aZvik871IZdwcL /0/xukD+wTmJ78Cqwxe7pYwNIwtFSwqz6sXG9/qztOQrD9YJGCXy3YTomkPZHY1R VzQLOMULLO4HPlB3wxd8a5ctwdQsHhGnA68/mJGfxEzhaSbzNndPqMLe4ILU1SgY cjC1/0uzb2g= =R/1Q -----END PGP MESSAGE----- --==_Exmh_1250498795P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message