From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 9 08:52:02 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D4116A418 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2007 08:52:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [IPv6:2001:1b20:1:3::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419D813C4E8 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2007 08:52:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (vuhupc@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l798oJHG089686; Thu, 9 Aug 2007 10:50:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l798oJfL089684; Thu, 9 Aug 2007 10:50:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) From: Oliver Fromme Message-Id: <200708090850.l798oJfL089684@lurza.secnetix.de> To: Alexander@leidinger.net (Alexander Leidinger) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 10:50:19 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20070809092710.papk9jozk0kswgcg@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 09 Aug 2007 10:50:24 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:29:38 +0000 Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, dan@danneh.org Subject: Re: nfe(4) issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 08:52:02 -0000 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Tony Holmes wrote: > > Let me add a "I concur" to this. I upgaded to 7-current 4 weeks ago > > for this very reason and I have been pleased with the stability and > > performance. I have enough confidence to deploy into production in > > the next couple of weeks. > > gcc 4.2.0 in -current has known defects. Yes, I know, that's why the default optimization setting in 7-current has been changed from -O2 to -O1 recently, until gcc 4.2.1 is in the tree. With -O1 I haven't encountered any problems so far ... Of course that doesn't mean there aren't any problems. But I'm actually very confident right now. :-) Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "And believe me, as a C++ programmer, I don't hesitate to question the decisions of language designers. After a decent amount of C++ exposure, Python's flaws seem ridiculously small." -- Ville Vainio