Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 06 Jun 2010 22:45:53 +0200
From:      Adam PAPAI <wooh@wooh.hu>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: sysbench / fileio - Linux vs. FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <4C0C0901.8060605@wooh.hu>
In-Reply-To: <201006061720.o56HKKBu069660@apollo.backplane.com>
References:  <4C09932B.6040808@wooh.hu>	<201006050236.17697.bruce@cran.org.uk>	<4C09FC43.8070804@wooh.hu>	<4C0A7F2F.3030105@elischer.org> <4C0A816A.9040403@feral.com> <201006061720.o56HKKBu069660@apollo.backplane.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 6/6/10 7:20 PM, Matthew Dillon wrote:

>     It would be interesting to see a blogbench comparison between UFS
>     and ZFS on the same hw/disk.


I'll do it, just tell me how do you want to run the tests.

The system params are:

8GB Memory
2x72GB SCSI HDD
2x3.4Ghz Xeon
Overall: Dell Poweredge 1850. With no raid installed.

I'm waiting the benchmark options to run.


- -- 
Adam PAPAI
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMDAkBAAoJEGq0EWvh5uiIPs8H+wUm/AMo7KBOViRG+OMZKl65
RgeJRBco/FvAjZc7Qu8EwfL3QqkZzZcDZmYODwvfhu4Hmw5QFrbu/QjUG3OFFBjH
6Kgyod2VsIRNo74LDTcdHIDwqCKfWYpH1sSkzr73ewgVAMtwen/6ob1hqW9i7jp8
4Fg5emWcJxJ6vh5t/5cgNhrpFdlZ1g4Zcd4yOPdgC04RoRC5Pla4QK6if6KdN4Qe
V9MmiJBdekdCwyaoL7sgXh6QLeXqEHd6D2BDYxS40BCH1OxTVnSb+AedqAeIO+OE
0470hgJnHb4500lu4UfdZtvj4DOUkDn/DiA7VU1we6iZCSitFQNxGi6fK2WyXaw=
=sERi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C0C0901.8060605>